EGRPS Legislative Committee
Purpose Statement
-Examine current education issues
-Stay informed about legislation regarding those issues
-Determine ramifications of legislation and the effects on students
-Provide accurate information regarding candidates and issues to district voters
-Establish relationships with our legislators
-Mobilize parents and community members to advocate for positive change in education policies and laws
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
Monday, June 3, 2013
opinion piece by Steve Norton on Skunk Works
When did parents become the enemy?
http://www.lansingstatejournal.com/article/20130602/OPINION02/306020061
http://www.lansingstatejournal.com/article/20130602/OPINION02/306020061
Tuesday, May 28, 2013
cyber schools already making plans
Okemos Parents for Schools reports that 32 cyber schools are set to open in Michigan in 2013-14. These will operate throughout the state and will compete with our schools for dollars.
http://okemosparentsforschools.blogspot.com/2013/05/cyber-charter-set-to-open-in-okemos.html
http://okemosparentsforschools.blogspot.com/2013/05/cyber-charter-set-to-open-in-okemos.html
Thursday, May 16, 2013
Action alert from Tri-County Alliance for Public Education
Yesterday,
the State's leading economists agreed that there is an additional and
unexpected $483 million surplus for the current fiscal year.
On
the heels of the well-documented financial crises in Buena Vista,
Pontiac and now Albion, we think there should be no debate: It's time to
do the right thing and invest in education.
This money could go a long way to restoring the devastating cuts enacted by Lansing politicians over the past few years.
Governor
Snyder talks a lot about
Michigan being the "Comeback State", but with headlines detailing
schools closing early and high schools ceasing to exist, it's clear that
mantra will never be realized without our Governor and Legislative
leadership finally funding schools.
Please TAKE ACTION to tell Lansing that it's time to do the right thing and invest in education!
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
Monday, May 13, 2013
Why will funding roads take money from schools
| A brief summary by Steve Norton, Michigan Parents for Schools | ||||
| Why will funding roads take money from schools? | ||||
So, what's up with roads and schools?
Dear Friends,
First off, let me thank the hundreds of you who have already contacted your State
Representatives about road funding and the threat to our schools. Your message is important and is getting through.
Many
people have asked for a bit more information about this whole deal -
and I certainly understand, because it's somewhat complicated. I'm
reprinting our earlier action alert below, but let me sketch out what is
happening on this issue:
The
Governor wants to find $1.2 billion to repair
state roads. The Legislature would like to do this for the Governor, but
a majority of legislators have signed "no new taxes" pledges to help
them get elected. Since the state doesn't have
$1.2 billion sitting around, that means finding new revenue. So, what to
do?
Our
lawmakers have been very clever - or sneaky, depending on your point of
view. Right now, there are two kinds of taxes on fuel: "specific"
taxes, like excise taxes, and the regular sales tax. The "specific"
taxes on fuel are already legally earmarked for transportation, but they
don't bring in enough money to fund the Governor's program. The regular
sales tax on gasoline and diesel fuel brings in some $1 billion, but
that mostly goes to schools, with the rest going to local governments
and the state general fund.
So,
to find money for roads, lawmakers are trying to have their cake and
eat it too: they want to increase the "specific" taxes on fuel that are
legally earmarked for transportation so they generate the money the
Governor wants. Then, they want to eliminate the sales tax on fuel, so
that they can say they didn't raise taxes.
Where
does this leave schools, which stand to lose some $750 million out of
the deal (almost $500 per student)? Well, they're
"working on it." Discussions have been going on for months about how to
"replace" the revenue to schools and local government. So far, there are
only some ideas floating around and no agreement on anything. The idea
that seems to come up most often is to increase the sales tax from 6% to
7%, hopefully making up the difference to schools. Sounds good, right?
We have some real problems with this "arrangement":
This
is nonsense, plain and simple. This whole exercise is simply to allow
our state "leaders" to push responsibility for finding new revenue off
onto the people. If we want to invest in our roads, we need to find a
sensible way to fund that and not put our schools at risk. If we are
going to change school funding, we need to address the fact
that current funding levels simply are not adequate to deliver an
excellent education to all our children.
If you'd like to know more about these bills, you can read the non-partisan House Fiscal Agency analyses here and here. For a review of transportation funding and spending, read this for lots of
detail.
Thanks for taking action to protect our public schools.
Steven Norton
Executive Director
Michigan Parents for Schools
|
Saturday, May 11, 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)